Archive for November, 2009

Naming Characters

Writing | Posted by Shannon
Nov 21 2009

Over the course of writing The Last Heir, I acquired several methods of naming characters. One was to establish naming patterns – Greek and biblical were my origins of choice, and Gaelic was a resort after that. Lists of Greek names could be found on baby-name sites that sorted by origin. Biblical (or “Hebrew”)  names could be found the same way – and by paging through Chronicles.

Sometimes I wanted the name to start with a particular letter, and I would pull up an alphabetical list. At other times, grasping for a fitting name, I would choose one whose meaning matched a role or trait of the character in question. Once, trying to name a hot-tempered character, I ran a search for meanings that included “fire” or “fiery”. “Stranger”, “leader”, “warrior”, and “black” are among other meanings I searched for, with varying success. (Theseus Declan illustrates both the origin method and the meaning method; Theseus is Greek and Declan is Gaelic and means “full of goodness”.)

Some names I use are wholly or partially invented. The ones I invented out of whole cloth are generally place-names or last names: Telnaria, Vonran, Uman, Regial, Anderliy, Shevyn … the list goes on. Kereth, on the other hand, was derived from a real name – an appropriately militaristic one: the Kerethites and Pelethites, David’s special guard, his mercenary soldiers. Usually it was the first names that were partially invented. D’John and Mareah were sort of variants for John and Mary. Calanthra was a combination of Calantha and Calandra; “Zelrynn” came about because “Zelrya” was almost what I wanted (a female name that suggested strength, if not beauty).

Sci-fi/Fantasy, Sci-fi vs. Fantasy

Literature, Writing | Posted by Shannon
Nov 13 2009

Science fiction and fantasy tend to be grouped together. Whether listed as “sci-fi/fantasy” by sellers or called “speculative fiction” by enthusiasts, the assumption is that they are the same kind of story. And, in a significant way, they are. Both bring us to worlds other than our own, filled with strange creatures and things that defy the laws of physics we live under.

But they take different roads to reach that end, and the worlds of science fiction and the worlds of fantasy are governed by different dynamics. Science fiction strives to be, well, scientific. The reigning idea of the genre is that everything, no matter how incredible, is completely natural, entirely explicable by the scientific process. Authors often incorporate scientific facts – or at least scientific theories – into their stories. Real phenomena like black holes, solar flares, the different atmospheres of other planets, etc. are dealt with frequently and even factually.

Of course, the science in such books is often purely theoretical, and sometimes impossible. The experts have told us that even traveling faster than the speed of light is impossible. When sci-fi writers cannot be scientific, they try to sound scientific. They explain their impossibilities with psuedo-scientific jargon, making a pretense of obedience to the laws of nature.

Fantasy makes no such pretense, no attempt to explain itself. The Fairyland lives under its own laws, and you don’t have to explain magic. No one wonders how Jack’s beanstalk, however tall, could reach a giant world. No one asks to know the process by which the fairy godmother turns the pumpkin into a coach. But then, no one asks why Cinderella must be back by midnight. The power of love’s first kiss is unquestionable in Faerie, and the doom of touching the needle of the commonest spindle is incontrovertible. The art of fantasy is to create wild freedoms that bring with them peculiar limitations.